ZIP 30064 housing market

Volume trajectory. Sales peaked early. October 2025 recorded 77 closings, the highest of the window, and the first three months averaged 64 sales per month. Volume then stepped down through the winter — February 2026 bottomed at 36 — and recovered only partially through spring and summer. The most recent three months (June–August 2026) averaged 43 sales per month, 32.3% below the opening three-month average. The market is doing fewer transactions at the end of the window than at the start.

The tension. Price and volume are moving in the same direction — down — but on different timelines. Volume weakened first (winter 2025–26) and never fully recovered; price held up through the spring before breaking lower in July and August. The 6-month median comparison remains positive at +5.8%, but that figure is inflated by the March 2026 spike and by the strong December 2025 and June 2026 medians. The 3-month comparison, which is closer to current conditions, is already negative at −6.1%. Read together, the short-horizon signals point to a market that is decelerating and becoming more negotiable, while the longer-horizon median still reflects the stronger pricing of late 2025 and early 2026.

Negotiation posture. With 69.7% of sales closing below list and only 9.0% above, the balance of negotiating leverage sits with buyers. The concentration of discounts is heaviest in the $350–400K band — the market's largest segment at 14.3% of sales — where 17 transactions closed at list but a larger cluster closed between 2% and 8% below. At the top of the market, the $1M+ band shows 7 sales at list and a long tail of 10%+ discounts, suggesting high-end sellers are conceding more to close.

What this means for the trajectory. The data describe a market that is stabilizing at a lower price level after a volatile spring, with thinning transaction volume and persistent buyer-favorable negotiation. It is not a market in freefall — the 12-month median of $497,000 remains the anchor — but the most recent month's $414,000 median and the 32.3% volume decline are the clearest signals of where current conditions sit.

Price is not evenly distributed. The single largest price band is $350,000–$400,000, which alone accounts for 14.3% of transactions, and the $350,000–$450,000 corridor together holds 154 of 602 sales. But the market has a long right tail: 38 sales closed at $1M or more, and 20 more in the $850,000–$900,000 band. The bottom of the market is thin — just 3 sales between $50,000 and $100,000 and 3 between $100,000 and $150,000.

Product type is the sharpest geographic-style divide inside the ZIP. Single Family homes are 84.4% of sales (508 transactions) at a 12-month median of $559,950 and $198/sqft, selling in a median 24 days. Condos are 7.5% of sales (45 transactions) at a $325,000 median, $180/sqft, and a much slower 43-day median. Townhouses sit between at 38 sales, a $340,000 median, $196/sqft and 26.5 days. The "Others" category — 11 sales at a $200,000 median — is too small to read as a market signal.

Housing age splits the ZIP into two pricing regimes. The 1980–1999 cohort is the volume backbone: 273 sales, 46.2% of the market, at a $450,000 median, and it is also the fastest-moving cohort at a median 18 days. The 2020-and-newer cohort is the price leader at a $767,125 median across 58 sales, while 1950–1979 stock is the value tier at a $415,000 median across 115 sales. The 2000–2009 cohort is the anomaly: a $710,300 median price but the slowest median DOM in the ZIP at 34 days.

Bedroom count tracks price almost mechanically. Four-bedroom homes are the single largest segment at 189 sales (32.0%) and the fastest at a median 18 days, with a $535,000 median. Five-bedroom homes (136 sales) reach a $700,000 median, and homes with six or more bedrooms (36 sales) reach $900,000. Two-bedroom-or-fewer homes are the entry tier at a $312,450 median across 62 sales.

HOA status is associated with a large price gap: the 371 HOA properties (61.6% of sales) had a 12-month median of $565,000 versus $425,000 for the 231 non-HOA sales — a 32.9% difference — while selling in a nearly identical median time (27 days with HOA, 25 without). That is a composition effect as much as anything else, since HOA-heavy newer subdivisions carry higher price points, but the near-identical DOM is the more interesting fact: the HOA premium in this ZIP is not being paid for speed.

The lowest asking prices cluster in older, smaller-footprint subdivisions. HEATHERSETT carries the lowest median list price in the snapshot at $194,500 across 4 listings, and it is also the slowest-moving subdivision in the ZIP at a median 111 days on market. SPINNAKER COVE lists at a $209,950 median across 4 listings at just $114.19/sqft — the lowest per-foot asking price in the snapshot — though it moves considerably faster at 37 days. CANNON GATE ($259,500 median, 3 listings, 71 days) and WEST HAMPTON ($269,950 median, 6 listings, 82 days) sit just above.

Speed and price do not move together here. The fastest-moving subdivisions by median days on market are LAKEFIELD MANOR at 26 days (despite a $699,999 median list price), CHEATHAM SPRINGS at 31 days ($392,995 median, $248.51/sqft), HAMPSHIRE at 31 days ($435,000 median, $158.73/sqft), LEES CROSSING at 34 days ($680,000 median) and SPINNAKER COVE at 37 days. The slowest are MACLAND PARK at 176 days ($480,000 median, 3 listings), MADISON WOODS at 140 days ($599,900 median, $148.05/sqft), HEATHERSETT at 111 days, OAKTON at 89 days and MCNEEL FARMS at 87 days ($565,000 median, $150.01/sqft).

The most useful pattern in the snapshot is the per-square-foot spread. Asking prices per square foot range from $114.19 at SPINNAKER COVE to $370.07 at OAKTON — a 3.2x gap within a single ZIP. Subdivisions asking above $240/sqft include OAKTON ($370.07), WHITLOCK HEIGHTS ($281.30), CHEATHAM SPRINGS ($248.51), ELLIS ($244.62) and WYNDHAM HOMES ($237.85, $352,000 median list price). Subdivisions asking below $175/sqft include SPINNAKER COVE ($114.19), MADISON WOODS ($148.05), MCNEEL FARMS ($150.01), HAMPSHIRE ($158.73), WEVR RUNN ($162.13, $367,500 median, 87 days) and WEST HAMPTON ($169.88). Buyers comparing subdivisions on headline price alone will misread value; the per-foot figures show where square footage is being priced cheaply and where it is not.

Several subdivisions show a notable mismatch between asking price and pace. WEVR RUNN asks a mid-market $367,500 median but sits 87 days — slower than subdivisions asking twice as much. WEST HAMPTON asks $269,950 and sits 82 days. MADISON WOODS asks $599,900 at only $148.05/sqft yet has been on market a median 140 days. Conversely, LEES CROSSING asks $680,000 and clears in 34 days, and LAKEFIELD MANOR asks $699,999 and clears in 26. The snapshot does not contain months-of-supply or sale-to-list data at the subdivision level, so it is not possible to determine from this dataset whether the slow subdivisions are overpriced, under-marketed, or simply thin.

Product type is the next layer of concentration, and it is heavily skewed. Single Family homes account for 84.4% of the 602 transactions. Condos are 7.5%, Townhouses 6.3%, and all other property types combined are 1.8%. In practical terms, ZIP 30064 is a single-family market with a small attached-housing fringe; roughly six of every seven closings are a detached house.

Price band concentration is much weaker than product concentration. The dominant band, $350,000–$400,000, holds only 14.3% of transactions. No single price band exceeds 15%, and the market spreads across at least 20 bands from $50,000 to $1M+. The top five bands by count — $350,000–$400,000 (86), $400,000–$450,000 (68), $450,000–$500,000 (54), $550,000–$600,000 (47) and $600,000–$650,000 (39) — together account for 294 of 602 sales. That is a broad, mid-market-dominated distribution rather than a market clustered at one price point.

Subdivision-level concentration cannot be measured from the supplied snapshot. The subdivision table records zero closings for the month across all 22 subdivisions, so no share-of-sales calculation is possible, and the top-five share of sales is reported as null. The 22 subdivisions in the snapshot collectively carry 96 active listings, with ELLIS alone holding 11 — the largest single pool — followed by WHITLOCK HEIGHTS at 8 and WEST HAMPTON at 6. Every other subdivision carries four or fewer active listings.

The practical answer to where this market is actually happening: in detached single-family homes in Marietta, priced between $350,000 and $500,000, in subdivisions built between 1980 and 1999. That combination — Single Family, mid-price band, late-20th-century construction — is the center of gravity for both transaction volume and dollar volume in ZIP 30064, and it is also the fastest-moving segment in the data, with 1980–1999 homes selling in a median 18 days.

That interpretation is reinforced by price per square foot. Single-family homes and townhouses both recorded a 12-month median of $196 per square foot — identical to the ZIP-wide figure — while condos came in at $180. The townhouse median price is 39% below the single-family median, but the townhouse median price per square foot is the same. The difference is size, not valuation intensity: townhouse buyers are paying the same rate per foot for a smaller structure. Condos, by contrast, trade at a genuine 8.2% discount per square foot, which is the only segment in the ZIP where the market applies a distinct per-foot haircut.

Liquidity and negotiation diverge far more than price does

The most useful finding in the type breakdown is that speed and negotiating leverage do not track price. Single-family homes were the fastest segment at a 12-month median of 24 days on market, and townhouses were close behind at 26.5 days. Condos took 43 days — 79% longer than single-family — and the "Other" category took 83 days, more than three times the single-family figure.

Sale-to-list ratios tell a similar story with one twist. Townhouses recorded the strongest median sale-to-list in the market at 97.62%, edging out single-family at 97.38%. Condos were the weakest at 95.18%, meaning the typical condo seller conceded roughly 4.8% from the asking price versus about 2.6% for a single-family seller. That is a difference of roughly 2.2 percentage points of contract value — on a $325,000 condo, about $7,200 of additional give relative to what a single-family seller at the same ratio would have conceded.

The practical read: condos in 30064 are the only mainstream segment where buyers hold a structural advantage. They take nearly twice as long to sell and close at a materially wider discount. Townhouses, despite being the cheapest attached product, are not a soft segment at all — they sell almost as fast as detached homes and hold price slightly better. Buyers hoping to negotiate hard on a townhouse should expect resistance; buyers looking at condos should expect room.

The "Other" category is a statistical artifact, not a market segment

Eleven sales classified as "Other" carry a 12-month median price of $200,000, a median of 83 days on market, and a median price per square foot of zero. That last figure is the tell: the $0 per-foot median means fewer than half of these records contain a usable square-footage value, so the metric collapses to zero rather than reflecting a real valuation. With only 11 transactions — 1.8% of the market — this group is too small to support any conclusion, and the $0 per-foot reading should be treated as missing data rather than as evidence that these properties are worthless per foot. The 97.96% median sale-to-list for this group is likewise built on a handful of records and should not be cited as the market's strongest negotiation outcome.

Bedrooms: the four-bedroom is the market's center of gravity and its fastest seller

Bedroom count is the single most powerful segmentation variable in this dataset, and the four-bedroom segment is where the market concentrates. Four-bedroom homes produced 189 sales, 32.0% of all transactions, the largest share of any bedroom group. Three-bedroom homes followed at 168 sales (28.4%), five-bedroom at 136 (23.0%), two-or-fewer at 62 (10.5%), and six-or-more at 36 (6.1%).

Price scales cleanly with bedroom count: a 12-month median of $312,450 for two-or-fewer bedrooms, $402,400 for three, $535,000 for four, $700,000 for five, and $900,000 for six or more. Each step up adds roughly $90,000 to $200,000 to the median, and the jump from five to six-plus bedrooms is the largest in absolute terms at $200,000.

The anomaly is speed. Four-bedroom homes sold in a 12-month median of 18 days — the fastest of any bedroom group and eight days faster than the ZIP-wide median of 26 days. Three-bedroom homes took 25 days, two-or-fewer took 29, five-bedroom took 29, and six-or-more took 34. The four-bedroom segment is simultaneously the most common and the quickest to clear, which is the signature of a market where the modal buyer profile is a family needing four bedrooms and competing for a limited set of matching homes.

Negotiation is remarkably tight across bedroom counts. Median sale-to-list ranges only from 96.67% (two-or-fewer bedrooms) to 97.56% (three bedrooms) — a spread of less than one percentage point. Bedroom count changes what a home costs and how fast it sells, but it barely changes how much a seller has to concede.

Bathrooms: three baths is the sweet spot, and the luxury end is the softest

Bathroom count produces a sharper liquidity signal than bedroom count. Two-bath homes dominate volume with 273 sales (46.2% of the market), followed by three-bath at 170 (28.8%), four-bath at 91 (15.4%), one-bath at 24 (4.1%), five-bath at 24 (4.1%), and six-or-more at 9 (1.5%).

Three-bath homes were the fastest segment in the entire dataset at a 12-month median of 21.5 days, and they also posted the strongest median sale-to-list at 98.06% — the highest of any bathroom group. Two-bath homes, despite being the volume leader, were slower at 25.5 days and weaker at 97.25%. This is a meaningful inversion: the most abundant product is not the most competitive product. Buyers are bidding up three-bath homes even though they are less common, which suggests three-bath inventory is undersupplied relative to demand at the prevailing price points.

The high end is where leverage shifts to buyers. Five-bath homes recorded a median price of $1,010,000 but a median sale-to-list of 96.57%, and six-or-more-bath homes — only 9 sales, so treat this cautiously — recorded a median price of $1,345,000 against a median sale-to-list of 94.06%, the weakest in the dataset. Four-bath homes sat at 96.53%. The pattern is consistent: above three baths, each additional bath adds substantial price but erodes the seller's negotiating position.

Bedroom-bathroom combinations: where the real speed and the real discounts live

Crossing bedrooms and bathrooms exposes segments that neither variable reveals alone.

The fastest combination in the market is a three-bedroom, three-bath home: 23 sales, a 12-month median of 11 days on market, and a median sale-to-list of 99.73% — the strongest ratio anywhere in the dataset, effectively at asking price. These homes carry a median of 2,331.5 square feet and a median price of $489,500. With only 23 transactions this is a small sample, but the combination of near-list pricing and 11-day marketing times is a strong signal of a genuinely competitive niche.

The highest-volume combination is three-bedroom, two-bath at 138 sales (23.4% of the market), with a median of 1,856 square feet, $399,500, 28 days on market, and 97.40% sale-to-list. This is the workhorse of ZIP 30064 — the most common single configuration of housing stock that trades.

Four-bedroom configurations split sharply by bathroom count. Four-bed, two-bath homes (81 sales) moved in a median of 14 days at $450,000 and 97.30% sale-to-list. Four-bed, three-bath homes (91 sales) took 24 days at $590,000 and 97.81%. Four-bed homes with four or more baths (17 sales) took 17 days at $860,000 but conceded the most of any four-bedroom group at 93.72% sale-to-list — a 6.3% discount from asking. That is the clearest example in the data of price tier and negotiating power moving in opposite directions.

At the top of the market, five-bedroom/five-bath-plus homes (10 sales) recorded a median of 5,355 square feet, $967,500, 41.5 days on market, and 93.21% sale-to-list. Six-or-more-bedroom homes with six-or-more baths (10 sales) reached a median of 6,404 square feet and $1,120,000 but took 55 days and closed at 96.44%. Both groups are too small to rank confidently, but both point the same direction: the largest homes in the ZIP are the slowest to sell and among the most negotiable.

Year built: the 1980s and 1990s cohort is the market's engine

Age is the strongest structural variable in this dataset. Homes built between 1980 and 1999 account for 273 sales — 46.2% of the entire market, nearly half of everything that traded in twelve months. The 1950–1979 cohort is second at 115 sales (19.5%), followed by 2000–2009 at 79 (13.4%), 2020 or later at 58 (9.8%), 2010–2019 at 51 (8.6%), and pre-1950 at just 15 (2.5%).

The 1980–1999 cohort is also the fastest and the most competitively priced. It recorded a 12-month median of 18 days on market — eight days faster than the ZIP-wide median — and the strongest median sale-to-list of any era at 97.96%. Its median price of $450,000 sits below the ZIP-wide median of $497,000, which means the fastest-selling, best-holding segment in 30064 is also the most affordable mainstream cohort. That combination — high volume, low price relative to the market, fast clearance, minimal discounting — is the definition of a liquid, well-matched segment.

New construction behaves almost oppositely on price and speed. Homes built in 2020 or later posted the highest median price in the dataset at $767,125 across 58 sales, but took 32.5 days to sell and closed at 97.21% sale-to-list. The 2000–2009 cohort is the slowest era in the market at 34 days, with a median price of $710,300 and a sale-to-list of 97.36%. Both newer cohorts carry prices 43% to 58% above the ZIP median while taking roughly a third longer to sell.

The pre-1950 cohort is the weakest on negotiation at 93.53% sale-to-list — the lowest of any era — across 15 sales, with a median price of $529,650 and 33 days on market. The sample is small, but the direction is unambiguous: the oldest housing stock in the ZIP trades at the widest discount to asking.

The 1950–1979 cohort sits in the middle on everything: 115 sales, $415,000 median (the lowest of any era), 27 days, and 96.51% sale-to-list. It is the most affordable era by median price but not the fastest or the most negotiable.

HOA: a 32.9% price gap that is not a speed gap

HOA status splits the market 61.6% to 38.4% in favor of HOA-governed properties — 371 sales with an HOA versus 231 without. The median price gap is large: $565,000 with an HOA versus $425,000 without, a difference of $140,000, or 32.9%.

The critical finding is that this price gap does not translate into a liquidity or negotiation gap. HOA properties recorded a 12-month median of 27 days on market; non-HOA properties recorded 25 days. That two-day difference is trivial. Median sale-to-list is 97.32% with an HOA and 97.48% without — a spread of 0.16 percentage points, effectively identical.

In other words, HOA-governed homes in 30064 sell for substantially more but sell no faster and concede no less. The most defensible reading is that the HOA price premium reflects what HOA properties are — newer, larger, and concentrated in the subdivisions that command higher prices — rather than any market preference for HOA governance itself. This dataset does not contain the square footage or age cross-tabulation needed to isolate the HOA effect from those underlying characteristics, so the 32.9% gap should be treated as a compositional difference between two groups of homes, not as evidence that an HOA causes a higher sale price.

Price bands: the $350,000–$400,000 band is the market's center

The distribution of the 602 sales across price bands is heavily concentrated in the middle. The $350,000–$400,000 band alone accounts for 86 sales, 14.3% of the market and the single largest band. The $400,000–$450,000 band follows at 68 sales, then $450,000–$500,000 at 54, $550,000–$600,000 at 47, $500,000–$550,000 at 38, $600,000–$650,000 at 39, and $650,000–$700,000 at 35.

Below $350,000 the market thins quickly: $300,000–$350,000 recorded 34 sales, $250,000–$300,000 recorded 23, $200,000–$250,000 recorded 24, and everything under $200,000 combined for just 13 sales across three bands. Above $700,000 the market also thins, but less abruptly than the bottom: $700,000–$750,000 recorded 32 sales, $750,000–$800,000 recorded 16, $800,000–$850,000 recorded 15, $850,000–$900,000 recorded 20, $900,000–$950,000 recorded 12, $950,000–$1,000,000 recorded 8, and the $1,000,000-plus band recorded 38.

That final figure is worth pausing on. The $1,000,000-plus band contains 38 sales — more than the $500,000–$550,000 band and nearly as many as the $600,000–$650,000 band. The luxury tier in 30064 is not a rounding error; it is a substantial and active slice of the market, larger than several mid-market bands.

Where negotiation is strongest and weakest across price bands

The negotiation data, which covers 598 transactions with a recorded list price, shows 69.7% of sales closed below list, 21.2% closed at list, and 9.0% closed above list. The band-level detail reveals where that leverage concentrates.

The $350,000–$400,000 band — the volume leader — shows the most balanced negotiation profile in the market. Of its transactions, 17 closed exactly at list, 12 closed in the -2% bucket, 13 in the -4% bucket, 12 in the -8% bucket, and 6 in the -6% bucket, with 2 sales above +20%. This is a band where a large share of sellers achieve list price or within 2% of it, and where a small but real set of homes still generates competitive bidding.

The $400,000–$450,000 band shows a similar profile with a slight tilt toward concessions: 16 sales at list, 13 in the -4% bucket, 10 in the -6% bucket, 8 in the -8% bucket, and 7 in the -2% bucket, with 5 sales at +2%. Combined, the $350,000–$450,000 range accounts for 33 of the market's 127 at-list closings — more than a quarter of all list-price sales in the ZIP.

The $450,000–$500,000 band is the most list-price-heavy in proportional terms: 15 of its 54 sales closed at exactly list, with 12 in the -4% bucket and 7 in the -2% bucket. That is 15 at-list closings in a band of 54, a higher concentration than the volume-leading $350,000–$400,000 band achieves.

At the top, the $1,000,000-plus band shows the widest spread of concessions. Of its transactions, 7 closed at list, 6 in the -10% bucket, 6 in the -8% bucket, 5 in the -6% bucket, 4 in the -2% bucket, 3 in the -16% bucket, and 2 in the -4% bucket, with single sales at +8%, +10%, and above +20%. The luxury tier is the only band where double-digit percentage discounts appear in meaningful numbers.

The $850,000–$900,000 band is the most concession-heavy mid-luxury band: 5 sales in the -2% bucket, 4 in the -4% bucket, 4 in the -6% bucket, and only 1 at list across 20 sales. Buyers in that band are consistently extracting 2% to 6% off asking.

What the segment data means for each audience

Buyers. The clearest leverage sits in condos (43-day median, 95.18% sale-to-list), pre-1950 homes (93.53% sale-to-list), homes with four or more bathrooms (93.72% to 96.53% sale-to-list), and the $850,000–$900,000 and $1,000,000-plus bands. The clearest competition sits in three-bed/three-bath homes (11-day median, 99.73% sale-to-list), four-bedroom homes generally (18-day median), and the 1980–1999 cohort (18-day median, 97.96% sale-to-list). A buyer targeting a four-bedroom home built between 1980 and 1999 in the $350,000–$450,000 range is operating in the most competitive corner of this market and should expect to move quickly and close near list.

Sellers. The 1980–1999 cohort and the three-bath segment are where the market is doing the work for you — 18-day and 21.5-day medians with sale-to-list ratios at or near the top of the range. Sellers of condos, pre-1950 homes, and homes above four bathrooms should price for a 3% to 6% concession and plan for a marketing period roughly 50% to 100% longer than the ZIP median. The $450,000–$500,000 band is the most forgiving price point in the market for holding list price, with 15 of 54 sales closing at exactly asking.

Agents. The bedroom-bathroom cross-tab is the most actionable pricing tool in this dataset. A three-bed/three-bath listing at a $489,500 median with an 11-day median and 99.73% sale-to-list is a fundamentally different pricing conversation than a three-bed/two-bath listing at $399,500 with a 28-day median and 97.40% sale-to-list. The bathroom count, not the bedroom count, is doing the heavy lifting on speed and price retention in the three-bedroom tier.

Investors. The $1,000,000-plus band's 38 sales and the 2020-or-later cohort's 58 sales at a $767,125 median indicate a substantial new-construction and high-end resale pipeline. The 32.9% HOA price gap, combined with the near-identical days-on-market and sale-to-list figures between HOA and non-HOA properties, suggests the premium is embedded in the physical product rather than in governance — relevant for anyone underwriting a buy-and-hold based on HOA status alone.

Questions this data answers directly

What is the most common type of home sold in 30064? Single-family, at 508 of 602 sales (84.4%), with a 12-month median of $559,950.

What is the fastest-selling home configuration in 30064? Three-bedroom, three-bath homes, at a 12-month median of 11 days on market and a 99.73% median sale-to-list across 23 sales.

Do condos sell for less per square foot than houses in 30064? Yes. Condos recorded a 12-month median of $180 per square foot versus $196 for both single-family homes and townhouses.

Do HOA properties sell faster in 30064? No. HOA properties recorded a 12-month median of 27 days on market versus 25 for non-HOA properties, while carrying a $140,000 higher median price.

What price range has the most sales in 30064? The $350,000–$400,000 band, with 86 sales, or 14.3% of the market.

Which era of housing sells fastest in 30064? Homes built between 1980 and 1999, at a 12-month median of 18 days on market across 273 sales.

Where do sellers concede the most in 30064? Pre-1950 homes (93.53% median sale-to-list), condos (95.18%), and homes with six or more bathrooms (94.06%).

That barbell is the defining structural feature of 30064 pricing. Roughly one in four sellers gets a contract in a week; roughly one in four waits more than two months. The 15-to-63-day band, which in a "normal" market would hold the bulk of transactions, accounts for only 38.4% of sales. Sellers are not experiencing an average market — they are experiencing one of two markets, and which one they land in is largely determined before the listing goes live.

Negotiation: sellers win the median, buyers win the tail. The sale-to-list distribution is the clearest evidence of where leverage sits. Of 598 transactions with list prices, 69.7% sold below list, 21.2% sold at list, and 9.0% sold above list. The median outcome is a modest discount, but the shape matters more than the center. The single largest bucket in the overall distribution is exactly 0% — 127 sales, or 21.2% of the market, closed at the asking price. The next largest clusters are the shallow discounts: 102 sales at −4%, 78 at −2%, and 70 at −6%. Together, sales within 6% of list account for 377 of 598 transactions, or 63.0%. Deep discounts are comparatively rare: only 11 sales closed more than 20% below list, and just 5 landed exactly at −20%.

The premium side is thinner but not trivial. Twenty-two sales closed at +2%, and 8 sales cleared more than 20% above list. Those 8 are the competitive-bid outliers — the transactions where multiple buyers converged and the list price functioned as a floor rather than a target.

Where the negotiating room actually is. Price band is the strongest single predictor of discount depth, and the pattern is not what a casual observer would guess. The $350–400K band — the single most active band in the ZIP, with 86 sales and 14.3% of the market — shows a pronounced concentration at and just below list: 17 sales at 0%, 12 at −2%, 13 at −4%, and 12 at −8%. But it also contains 2 sales below −20% and 2 sales above +20%, the widest tails of any band. This is the ZIP's most liquid price point and its most bifurcated: homes here either trade near ask or blow out in one direction or the other.

The $400–450K band (68 sales) is the most disciplined in the ZIP. Sixteen sales closed at exactly list, 13 at −4%, 10 at −6%, and 8 at −8%. Only one sale fell below −20% and only one exceeded +20%. Buyers in this band face the least room to negotiate a deep cut; sellers here hold the firmest pricing power of any mid-market segment.

The $450–500K band (54 sales) is similarly tight — 15 sales at 0%, 12 at −4%, 7 at −2% — with only 2 sales above +20% and none below −16%. Above $500K, the picture shifts. The $550–600K band (47 sales) shows 14 sales at list and 11 at −2%, but also 2 sales at −16% and a long, thin discount tail. The $1M+ band (38 sales) is the most discount-heavy large segment in the ZIP: 6 sales at −10%, 6 at −8%, 5 at −6%, 3 at −16%, and only 7 at list. Luxury sellers in 30064 are, on the evidence of these transactions, negotiating from a weaker position than sellers in the $400–500K core.

At the bottom of the market, the $200–250K band (24 sales) is unusually firm: 6 sales at list, 4 at −4%, and only 2 below −20%. The $250–300K band (23 sales) is softer, with 3 sales at −14% and 3 at −10% against 5 at list. Small counts in both bands warrant caution, but the direction is consistent: the entry tier is not where the deepest discounts live.

Property type: condos are the ZIP's weakest hand. Single Family dominates with 508 sales (84.4%), a 12-month median of $559,950, a median of $198/sqft, a median DOM of 24, and a median sale-to-list of 97.38%. Townhouses (38 sales) are close behind on negotiation at 97.62% and slightly slower at 26.5 days. Condos are the outlier: 45 sales, a median of $325,000, a median of $180/sqft, a median DOM of 43, and the weakest sale-to-list in the ZIP at 95.18%. A condo seller in 30064 is, on these numbers, accepting roughly two percentage points more discount than a single-family seller and waiting nearly three weeks longer. The "Others" category (11 sales) shows a median DOM of 83 and a median sale-to-list of 97.96%, but with 11 transactions it is too small to support a conclusion.

Age: the 1980–1999 cohort is the pricing engine. Homes built between 1980 and 1999 — 273 sales, 46.2% of the ZIP — posted the fastest median DOM in the dataset at 18 days and the strongest median sale-to-list at 97.96%. They are also the second-lowest-priced era at a median of $450,000. This is the ZIP's volume workhorse: modestly priced, fast-moving, and negotiated close to ask. The 2000–2009 cohort (79 sales) is the slowest at a median of 34 days despite a median price of $710,300, and the 2020+ cohort (58 sales) is the most expensive at a median of $767,125 but sits at a median of 32.5 days. Pre-1950 homes (15 sales) show the weakest sale-to-list at 93.53%, but the sample is small and the median price is high ($529,650), suggesting a thin, idiosyncratic segment rather than a broad trend.

Bedrooms and baths: the 4-bedroom sweet spot and the 3/3 anomaly. Four-bedroom homes (189 sales) are the fastest in the ZIP at a median of 18 days, with a median price of $535,000 and a sale-to-list of 97.36%. Three-bedroom homes (168 sales) post the strongest sale-to-list at 97.56% and a median DOM of 25. The 3-bed/3-bath combination is the standout: 23 sales, a median DOM of 11 days, and a median sale-to-list of 99.73% — the highest in the entire dataset. That is a small sample, but the magnitude of the gap (nearly 2.5 points above the ZIP median) is large enough to flag as a genuine micro-segment. At the other end, 5-bed/5-bath homes (10 sales) show the weakest sale-to-list at 93.21% and a median DOM of 41.5, and 6+ bed / "Others" bath homes (10 sales) sit at a median DOM of 55. Both are too small to generalize, but they point to the same conclusion: the deepest end of the bedroom/bath spectrum is the slowest and most negotiable.

HOA: a price gap, not a speed gap. Homes with an HOA (371 sales, 61.6%) had a 12-month median price of $565,000 versus $425,000 for no-HOA homes (231 sales) — a 32.9% gap. But the velocity difference is negligible: median DOM of 27 days with HOA versus 25 without, and sale-to-list of 97.32% versus 97.48%. The HOA premium in 30064 is a price-and-product story, not a negotiation story. HOA properties are more expensive because they are different homes, not because they command better terms.

Subdivision-level marketing time. The current-month subdivision snapshot shows active-listing medians ranging from 26 days in Lakefield Manor (median list $699,999) to 176 days in Macland Park (median list $480,000). Heathersett, at a median list of $194,500, shows 111 days; Oakton, at $1,100,000, shows 89 days. These are active-listing medians, not sold medians, and the sample per subdivision is small (3–11 active listings), so they describe current asking behavior rather than closed outcomes. But the spread — 26 to 176 days — is a useful reminder that "the market" in 30064 is a composite of micro-markets with very different absorption speeds.

What this means for each side of the table. Sellers in the $400–500K, 4-bedroom, 1980–1999-built single-family segment are operating in the ZIP's strongest position: fast, close to ask, and liquid. Sellers of condos, pre-1950 homes, and $1M+ properties face measurably more discount pressure and longer marketing times. Buyers should expect the most room in the condo segment, the $1M+ tier, and the 5-bed/5-bath and 6+ bedroom extremes — and should expect the least room in the $400–450K band and the 3-bed/3-bath configuration, where sale-to-list ratios above 99% indicate genuine competition.

Prices: a violent March spike and an August collapse. The 12-month median price was $497,000. Monthly medians ranged from a peak of $593,135 in March 2026 to a trough of $414,000 in August 2026 — an 18.8% span across the window. The March figure represents a 31.1% month-over-month jump, the largest single move in the dataset, and it is almost certainly a mix effect rather than a broad repricing: 45 sales closed that month, and a cluster of high-end closings can move a median sharply at that volume. The August median of $414,000 is the lowest of the 12 months and represents a 21.9% decline from July's $530,000. The three months ending August 2026 posted a median 6.1% below the prior three months, even as the six-month comparison shows a 5.8% gain — a divergence that tells the story of a year that strengthened through the spring and then reversed.

The monthly sequence — $510,000 (Sep), $499,000 (Oct), $446,250 (Nov), $532,500 (Dec), $457,000 (Jan), $452,500 (Feb), $593,135 (Mar), $495,000 (Apr), $492,500 (May), $540,500 (Jun), $530,000 (Jul), $414,000 (Aug) — shows no clean seasonal price curve. December's $532,500 is higher than November's $446,250 and January's $457,000, which is the opposite of a simple winter-softening story. March's spike and August's collapse are the two dominant features, and both are more consistent with transaction-mix shifts than with a smooth seasonal gradient.

What can and cannot be concluded. The volume pattern — autumn high, winter low, spring recovery, summer fade — is the most seasonally legible signal in the data, and it aligns with the broad expectation that closings cluster in the fall and thin out in mid-winter. But with only one annual cycle, this is an observed monthly pattern, not a demonstrated recurring seasonality. The price series is too volatile and too mix-sensitive at this transaction volume to support a seasonal price claim at all. The August 2026 median of $414,000 is a real observation about that month's closings; it is not evidence that prices seasonally bottom in August.

The momentum question. The clearest trend in the data is not seasonal — it is directional. Sales volume fell 32.3% from the first three months of the window to the last three, and the most recent month's median price was 18.8% below the 12-month peak. Whether that reflects a genuine cooling trend, a shift in which homes traded, or the ordinary noise of a 600-transaction annual market cannot be resolved from 12 months of records. What can be said is that the ZIP entered the window with 64 sales a month at a $510,000 median and exited it with 43 sales a month at a $414,000 median, and that the second half of the year did not deliver the spring rebound the first half's autumn strength might have suggested.

Where buyers should expect to pay up. The $550–600K band (47 sales) and the $450–500K band (54 sales) both show a pronounced cluster at list — 14 and 15 sales respectively at 0% — with comparatively few deep cuts. The $550–600K band has 11 sales at just −2%, suggesting sellers there are holding firm and buyers are meeting them. Above $1M, 38 sales occurred and the distribution is again list-heavy: 7 at 0%, with the deepest cluster at −8% and −10% (6 each). Luxury buyers in this ZIP are not, on the evidence, winning large percentage concessions.

Speed is concentrated in a narrow slice of the market. Of 601 sales with DOM data, 24.1% closed within 7 days and 37.3% within 14 days. But 24.3% took 64 days or longer. The 12-month median DOM is 26 days. The practical read: a buyer who needs time to inspect, appraise, and negotiate is competing against a segment of sellers whose homes move in under a week, and a buyer who hesitates on a well-priced home in the fast cohort will lose it. The 4-bedroom segment — 189 sales, 32.0% of the market — posted a median DOM of 18 days, the fastest of any bedroom count. The 3-bed/3-bath combination was faster still at a median of 11 days across 23 sales, though that sample is small enough that it should be treated as a signal, not a rule.

Where buyers can find relative value. Three combinations stand out. First, condos: 45 sales, a 12-month median price of $325,000, a median $180/sqft, and the weakest sale-to-list ratio of any property type at 95.2% — meaning the typical condo buyer negotiates roughly 4.8% off list. Condos also sat longer, with a median DOM of 43 days versus 24 for single-family. Second, the 1950–1979 build era: 115 sales, a median price of $415,000 — the lowest of any era — with a median DOM of 27 days and a sale-to-list ratio of 96.5%. Third, the ≤2-bedroom cohort: 62 sales, a median price of $312,450, and a sale-to-list ratio of 96.7%. Each of these combines meaningful liquidity with a measurable negotiation margin.

What buyers should watch. The 2000–2009 build era is the slowest-moving cohort in the dataset, with a median DOM of 34 days across 79 sales — slower than pre-1950 stock (33 days, 15 sales) and materially slower than the 1980–1999 cohort (18 days, 273 sales). Newer is not faster here. The 2020+ cohort, 58 sales, carried the highest median price at $767,125 but a median DOM of 32.5 days. Buyers targeting post-2000 construction should expect more time to negotiate and a seller who has already been waiting.

So what: A buyer in ZIP 30064 should concentrate offers in the $350,000–$450,000 band, where volume is deepest and the discount distribution is fattest; treat condos and 1950–1979 single-family homes as the two segments where both price and negotiation margin favor the buyer; and recognize that in the $550,000–$600,000 band and above $1M, the data shows sellers holding near list, so a lowball strategy there is likely to lose the property rather than win a discount.

Bathroom count tells a sharper story than bedroom count at the top end. Three-bath homes, 170 sales, posted a median DOM of 21.5 days and the strongest sale-to-list ratio of any bath count at 98.1%. Four-bath homes, 91 sales, slowed to 29 days and 96.5%. Five-bath homes, 24 sales, ran 26.5 days at 96.6%. Homes with six or more baths, 9 sales, ran 32 days at 94.1% — the weakest ratio in the bath distribution. The pattern is consistent: as bathroom count rises past three, both speed and price realization deteriorate. That is a small-sample observation at the 5+ bath level and should be treated as directional.

Where sellers are conceding the most. Pre-1950 homes, 15 sales, recorded the weakest sale-to-list ratio of any era at 93.5% — a typical concession of roughly 6.5% off list. The ≤2-bedroom cohort, 62 sales, posted 96.7%. Condos, 45 sales, posted 95.2% with a median DOM of 43 days. These three segments share a common trait: they are the ZIP's least liquid, and the data shows sellers there paying for that illiquidity in both time and price.

HOA status correlates with a large price gap but essentially no speed gap. Homes with an HOA, 371 sales (61.6% of the market), had a 12-month median price of $565,000. Homes without an HOA, 231 sales, had a median of $425,000 — a 32.9% difference. But median DOM was 27 days with an HOA versus 25 days without, and sale-to-list ratios were 97.3% and 97.5% respectively. The HOA premium in this ZIP is a price-level phenomenon, not a liquidity phenomenon. HOA homes are not selling faster; they are simply a different, more expensive product class. Sellers should not assume an HOA accelerates a sale, and buyers should not assume it slows one.

New construction competes on price, not on speed. The 2020+ cohort, 58 sales, carried the highest median price of any era at $767,125 — 70.5% above the 1980–1999 median of $450,000 — but its median DOM of 32.5 days was 14.5 days slower than the 1980–1999 cohort. Newer homes in this ZIP are clearing at a substantial premium but taking meaningfully longer to do it. Existing-home sellers in the $700,000+ range are competing against new product that is priced higher but moving slower, which is a more favorable competitive position than it first appears.

Pricing discipline matters most in the mid-band. In the $350–400K band, 17 of 86 sales closed at exactly list and 12 closed at −2%, while only 2 closed above +20% and 2 at −20% or worse. The distribution is tightly clustered near list. In the $550–600K band, 14 of 47 closed at list and 11 at −2%. These are bands where the market is pricing efficiently and where an over-ask strategy is unlikely to be rewarded. By contrast, the $700–750K band shows 10 sales at −4% and 8 at −2% across 32 transactions — a band where sellers are systematically giving back a small, consistent amount.

So what: A seller in ZIP 30064 with a 1980–1999, 4-bedroom, 3-bath home is holding the ZIP's most liquid asset class and should price near list with confidence. A seller of a pre-1950 home, a condo, or a 5+ bath property should budget for a longer DOM and a 3–6% concession from list. A seller of a 2020+ home should expect a premium price but a marketing period roughly two weeks longer than the ZIP median.

The fastest-moving business is in 4-bedroom, 1980–1999, single-family homes. Four-bedroom homes posted a median DOM of 18 days across 189 sales. The 1980–1999 era posted 18 days across 273 sales. Single-family homes posted 24 days across 508 sales. The 3-bed/3-bath combination posted 11 days across 23 sales — the fastest cell in the beds-baths matrix, though the sample is small. An agent who can source listings in these segments is working in the ZIP's highest-velocity inventory.

Where homes are sitting. The 64+ day bucket contains 146 sales — 24.3% of all transactions with DOM data. That is nearly a quarter of the market taking more than two months to close. The slowest property type is "Others" at a median of 83 days across 11 sales, followed by condos at 43 days across 45 sales. The slowest build era is 2000–2009 at 34 days across 79 sales. The slowest bedroom count is 6+ at 34 days across 36 sales. The slowest bath count is 6+ at 32 days across 9 sales. These are the segments where an agent's pricing and staging expertise has the most room to change an outcome.

Negotiation margins are widest in condos and pre-1950 homes. Condos posted a median sale-to-list of 95.2% across 45 sales — the weakest of any property type. Pre-1950 homes posted 93.5% across 15 sales. The ≤2-bedroom cohort posted 96.7% across 62 sales. An agent representing a buyer in these segments has a documented basis for a 3–6% ask below list; an agent representing a seller in these segments needs to set expectations accordingly at the listing appointment.

Subdivision-level listing activity is concentrated in a handful of communities. As of the 2026-10-01 snapshot, ELLIS carried 11 active listings with a median list price of $939,650 and a median DOM of 63 days. WHITLOCK HEIGHTS carried 8 active listings at a median list price of $724,500 and a median DOM of 62 days. WEST HAMPTON carried 6 active listings at a median list price of $269,950 and a median DOM of 82 days. HEATHERSETT carried 4 active listings at a median list price of $194,500 and a median DOM of 111 days. These are the ZIP's most inventory-heavy subdivisions on that date, and the DOM figures suggest meaningful standing inventory rather than rapid turnover.

The fastest-listing subdivisions on that same snapshot were LAKEFIELD MANOR (median DOM 26 days, 3 active listings, median list $699,999), CHEATHAM SPRINGS (31 days, 4 listings, $392,995), and HAMPSHIRE (31 days, 3 listings, $435,000). The slowest were MACLAND PARK (176 days, 3 listings, $480,000), MADISON WOODS (140 days, 3 listings, $599,900), and HEATHERSETT (111 days, 4 listings, $194,500). The spread between the fastest and slowest subdivision median DOM is 150 days — a gap that reflects both price positioning and community-specific demand.

Market shifts worth noting. Sales volume declined from an average of 64 per month in the first three months of the window (2025-09 through 2025-11) to 43 per month in the most recent three (2026-06 through 2026-08) — a 32.3% decline. The peak volume month was 2025-10 at 77 sales; the trough was 2026-02 at 36. The 12-month median price span change was −18.8%, with the peak month at 2026-03 ($593,135) and the trough at 2026-08 ($414,000). The most recent month's median was $414,000, down 21.9% from the prior month. Agents should treat the recent volume and price softening as the current operating environment, not a seasonal blip, until more months of data confirm otherwise.

So what: An agent in ZIP 30064 should concentrate prospecting in the $350,000–$500,000 single-family band, where transaction density is highest and comparable-sale support is strongest; build a listing-presentation narrative around the 1980–1999, 4-bedroom, 3-bath velocity advantage; and prepare buyer clients in condos, pre-1950 homes, and the ≤2-bedroom cohort for a documented 3–6% negotiation margin. The 32.3% volume decline and the recent median-price drop are the two numbers that should shape every pricing conversation this quarter.

Sale-to-list discounts are largest in the segments with the weakest liquidity. Condos posted a median sale-to-list of 95.2% across 45 sales. Pre-1950 homes posted 93.5% across 15 sales. The ≤2-bedroom cohort posted 96.7% across 62 sales. The 6+ bath cohort posted 94.1% across 9 sales. The 5-bath cohort posted 96.6% across 24 sales. These are the segments where the gap between asking and clearing prices is widest — and where the small sample sizes at the top end warrant caution.

Older housing stock is available but not cheap relative to its era. Pre-1950 homes, 15 sales, carried a median price of $529,650 — higher than the 1950–1979 median of $415,000 and higher than the 1980–1999 median of $450,000. The pre-1950 cohort is small and its median price is elevated, which suggests the pre-1950 stock in this ZIP is not a uniform value pool. The 1950–1979 cohort, by contrast, is both larger (115 sales) and lower-priced ($415,000 median), making it the more observable older-stock segment.

Geographic concentration is absolute at the city level. All 602 sales occurred in Marietta. The top-5 and top-10 city shares are both 100.0%, and the HHI computed over the top-10 cities is 10,000.0 — the maximum possible value, reflecting a single-city dataset. At the subdivision level, the 2026-10-01 snapshot shows 22 subdivisions with active listings, led by ELLIS (11 active listings), WHITLOCK HEIGHTS (8), and WEST HAMPTON (6). No subdivision recorded a closing in that month's snapshot, so subdivision-level transaction velocity cannot be assessed from this data.

Price trends show a wide swing within the 12-month window. The median price peaked at $593,135 in 2026-03 and troughed at $414,000 in 2026-08 — a span change of −18.8%. The largest single-month move was +31.1% in 2026-03. The 3-month average versus the prior 3-month average was −6.1%, while the 6-month versus prior 6-month was +5.8%. The most recent month's median was down 21.9% from the prior month. These are large swings on a monthly median, which is sensitive to mix; the 6-month comparison showing +5.8% is the more stable read of the trend.

Volume has declined materially. Average monthly sales fell from 64 in the first three months of the window to 43 in the most recent three — a 32.3% decline. The peak volume month was 2025-10 at 77 sales; the trough was 2026-02 at 36. The most recent month recorded 39 sales. A declining-volume, wide-price-swing environment is one in which exit timing and holding-period assumptions carry more risk than in a stable market.

What this dataset does not contain. It does not contain rental rates, vacancy, operating expenses, property taxes, insurance, financing terms, or cap rates. No yield, cash-on-cash return, or investment return can be calculated from the supplied data. Any statement about investment performance would require information not present here.

So what: An investor looking at ZIP 30064 should focus further investigation on the 1950–1979 single-family cohort (115 sales, $415,000 median, 27-day median DOM) and the condo segment (45 sales, $325,000 median, 95.2% sale-to-list, 43-day median DOM) as the two segments combining lower entry prices with observable negotiation margins. The 1980–1999 cohort offers the deepest liquidity but at a higher median price. The 32.3% volume decline and the −18.8% median-price span change are the two macro conditions that should inform any acquisition or disposition timing decision — and the absence of rent, expense, and financing data means no return calculation is possible from this dataset alone.

3. HOA properties carry a 32.9% median price premium but no speed advantage. With-HOA homes (371 sales) had a 12-month median of $565,000 versus $425,000 for the 231 no-HOA sales, yet median DOM was 27 versus 25 days — the HOA cohort actually sold marginally slower. The premium is a composition effect (newer, larger, amenitized subdivisions), not a liquidity effect.

4. The 1980–1999 housing stock is the fastest-moving and most reliable segment in the ZIP. With 273 sales (46.2% of all transactions), this era posted an 18-day median DOM and a 97.96% median sale-to-list — the strongest of any era. Pre-1950 homes (15 sales) were the weakest negotiators at 93.53% of list, and 2000–2009 homes (79 sales) were the slowest at 34 days despite a $710,300 median price.

5. Four-bedroom homes are the liquidity sweet spot; five-bedroom homes are the pricing sweet spot. Four-bed sales (189, the largest bedroom cohort) moved in a median of 18 days. Five-bed sales (136) took 29 days but commanded a $700,000 median. The 4BR/2BA configuration alone accounts for 81 sales at a 14-day median DOM and 97.30% of list — the fastest high-volume configuration in the dataset.

6. The 3BR/3BA configuration is the single strongest negotiation position in 30064. Just 23 sales, but a 99.73% median sale-to-list and an 11-day median DOM — the best of any bed/bath combination. By contrast, 6+BR/5BA homes (10 sales) closed at 93.21% of list with a 41.5-day median. Small samples, but the spread is large enough to flag.

7. The $1M+ tier is the most discount-dependent segment in the ZIP. Of 38 sales above $1M, 6 closed at −10%, 6 at −8%, 5 at −6%, and 3 at −16%. Only 7 closed at list and just 2 above. The luxury tier negotiates in a completely different register than the $450–500K band, where 15 of 54 sales closed at list.

8. August 2026 was a genuine price break, not noise. The 12-month median is $497,000, but August's median was $414,000 — a 21.9% month-over-month drop and the trough of the 12-month window. March 2026 was the peak at $593,135. The $179,135 peak-to-trough swing within six months is the largest internal price range in the dataset.

9. Volume is contracting faster than price is falling. The most recent three months (June–August 2026) averaged 43 sales per month versus 64 in the first three months (September–November 2025) — a 32.3% decline. Over the same window the 3-month median moved only −6.1%. Sellers are withdrawing or holding rather than capitulating.

10. Subdivision asking prices span a 5.7x range within one ZIP. Active-listing medians run from $194,500 in Heathersett to $1,100,000 in Oakton. The $/sqft spread is even wider: Spinnaker Cove lists at $114/sqft while Oakton lists at $370/sqft — a 3.2x gap that has nothing to do with ZIP-level pricing and everything to do with subdivision-level product. Heathersett's 111-day median DOM and Macland Park's 176-day median DOM show that the slow end of 30064 is not slow because of price, but because of positioning.

Are home prices in 30064 rising or falling? Both, depending on the window. The median price rose 5.8% comparing the most recent six months with the prior six months, but fell 6.1% comparing the most recent three months with the prior three, and dropped 18.8% from the first month of the window (September 2025) to the last (August 2026). The 12-month median of $497,000 is the most stable single reference point.

How fast do homes sell in 30064? The 12-month median days on market was 26 days. Speed varied sharply by segment: 24.1% of sales went under contract within 7 days and 37.3% within 14 days, while 24.3% took 64 days or longer.

What is the median price per square foot in 30064? The 12-month median price per square foot was $196 across all property types. Single family homes led at $198 per square foot, townhouses matched the market at $196, and condos trailed at $180.

What was the highest median price month in 30064 over the past year? March 2026 recorded the highest monthly median of the 12-month window at $593,135, a 31.1% jump from the prior month — the largest single-month price move in the period. It was also a low-volume month, with just 45 closings.

What was the lowest median price month in 30064 over the past year? August 2026 posted the lowest monthly median of the window at $414,000, down 21.9% from July 2026. That month saw 39 closings.

How much negotiating room do buyers have in 30064? Of the 598 transactions with a recorded list price, 69.7% closed below asking, 21.2% closed at asking, and 9.0% closed above asking. The 12-month median sale-to-list ratio was 97.4% for single family homes.

Which price band in 30064 has the most sales? The $350,000–$400,000 band was the dominant segment, accounting for 14.3% of all sales. It was also the band with the most transactions closing at exactly list price (17 sales at 0%) and the most clustered within 2% below list.

Which property type sells fastest in 30064? Single family homes sold fastest, with a 12-month median of 24 days on market across 508 sales. Condos were the slowest of the major types at 43 days, and the small "Other" category (11 sales) took a median of 83 days.

Which property type has the largest discount in 30064? Condos showed the weakest sale-to-list performance, with a 12-month median of 95.2% of asking price across 45 sales. Single family homes closed at a median of 97.4% and townhouses at 97.6%.

How many bedrooms is most common in 30064 sales? Four-bedroom homes were the largest segment at 32.0% of sales (189 transactions), followed by three-bedroom homes at 28.4% (168 sales). Four-bedroom homes also sold fastest, with a 12-month median of 18 days on market.

Do homes with an HOA sell for more in 30064? HOA properties had a higher 12-month median sale price of $565,000 versus $425,000 for non-HOA homes, a 32.9% gap. HOA homes also took slightly longer to sell, with a median of 27 days versus 25 days. This is an observed price difference, not evidence that HOA status causes higher prices.

What is the most expensive housing type in 30064? Homes with six or more bedrooms had the highest 12-month median price at $900,000 across 36 sales. By bathroom count, homes with six or more baths reached a median of $1,345,000, though that segment had only 9 sales.

How much of 30064's housing stock is newer construction? Homes built in 2020 or later accounted for 9.8% of sales (58 transactions) and carried the highest 12-month median price of any era at $767,125. The largest era by volume was 1980–1999, at 46.2% of sales with a median of $450,000.

Which era of home sells fastest in 30064? Homes built between 1980 and 1999 sold fastest, with a 12-month median of 18 days on market across 273 sales. Homes built 2000–2009 were the slowest at 34 days.

Which subdivisions in 30064 have the highest list prices? In the current-month subdivision snapshot, Oakton had the highest median list price at $1,100,000 across 3 active listings, followed by Ellis at $939,650 (11 active listings) and Addies Pond at $730,000 (3 active listings).

Which subdivisions in 30064 have the lowest list prices? Heathersett had the lowest median list price at $194,500 across 4 active listings, followed by Spinnaker Cove at $209,950 (4 listings) and Cannon Gate at $259,500 (3 listings).

Which subdivisions in 30064 have the highest price per square foot? Oakton led at $370 per square foot, followed by Whitlock Heights at $281 and Cheatham Springs at $249. Spinnaker Cove had the lowest at $114 per square foot.

Which subdivisions in 30064 have the longest days on market? Macland Park had the longest median days on market at 176 days across 3 active listings, followed by Madison Woods at 140 days and Heathersett at 111 days.

Which subdivisions in 30064 sell fastest? Lakefield Manor had the shortest median days on market at 26 days across 3 active listings, followed by Cheatham Springs and Hampshire, both at 31 days.

How much did sales volume change in 30064 over the past year? The most recent three months (June–August 2026) averaged 43 sales per month, down 32.3% from the 64 sales per month averaged in the first three months of the window (September–November 2025). The peak volume month was October 2025 with 77 closings; the trough was February 2026 with 36.

What is the most common home configuration sold in 30064? The most common bed-and-bath combination was 3 bedrooms with 2 baths, at 23.4% of sales (138 transactions), with a 12-month median price of $399,500 and a median of 28 days on market. The fastest-selling configuration was 3 bedrooms with 3 baths, at a median of 11 days.

What is the largest home size sold in 30064? The largest median square footage by configuration was 6,404 square feet for homes with six or more bedrooms and an "Other" bath count, which sold at a median of $1,120,000 across 10 sales. The overall 12-month average home size was 2,856 square feet.

How many condos and townhouses sold in 30064? Condos accounted for 45 sales (7.5% of the market) at a 12-month median of $325,000, while townhouses accounted for 38 sales (6.3%) at a median of $340,000. Single family homes dominated with 508 sales, or 84.4% of the market.

What share of 30064 sales closed at or above asking price? 30.2% of the 598 transactions with a recorded list price closed at or above asking — 21.2% at list and 9.0% above. The remaining 69.7% closed below asking.

Which 30064 price band has the most sales closing above asking? The $350,000–$400,000 band recorded 2 sales more than 20% above list and 1 sale 6% above list, alongside 17 at list. The $450,000–$500,000 band had 2 sales more than 20% above list and 1 sale 8% above list. Both bands show that over-asking outcomes exist even in a market where most sales close below list.